Syntactic relations: Difference between revisions
From UNLwiki
				
				
				Jump to navigationJump to search
				
				
| imported>Martins No edit summary | imported>Martins No edit summary | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| Consider, for instance, the examples below: | Consider, for instance, the examples below: | ||
| ;1. Verbal  | ;1. Verbal Phrase (VP)  | ||
| <blockquote>Peter gave a new book to Mary yesterday.</blockquote> | <blockquote>Peter gave a new book to Mary yesterday.</blockquote> | ||
| :*"gave" is the HEAD (nucleus) of the verbal phrase " | :*"gave" is the HEAD (nucleus) of the whole verbal phrase (because the whole structure is derived from "gave") | ||
| :*"a new book" and "to Mary" are COMP (complements) of "gave" | :*"a new book" and "to Mary" are COMP (complements) of "gave" (because they are necessary to complete the meaning of "gave")<ref>The sentences "*Peter gave to Mary yesterday" (i.e., without "a new book") and "*Peter gave a new book yesterday" (without "to Mary") will not be well-formed in the sense that something would be missing.</ref>  | ||
| :*"yesterday" is an ADJT (adjunct) of "gave"   | :*"yesterday" is an ADJT (adjunct) of "gave" (because, although relevant, they are not necessary to complete the meaning of "gave")<ref>The sentence "Peter gave a new book to Mary", although less informative, would be well-formed.</ref> | ||
| :*"Peter" is the SPEC (specifier) of "gave" | :*"Peter" is the SPEC (specifier) of "gave" (because it is the subject of "gave") | ||
| ;2. Nominal Phrase (NP) | |||
| == Notes == | |||
| <references /> | |||
Revision as of 17:36, 13 August 2013
Syntactic roles are the roles that constituents play inside a syntactic structure. The UNLarium framework follows the X-bar approach and proposes four syntactic roles:
- HEAD is the nucleus or the source of the whole syntactic structure, which is actually derived (or projected) out of it.
- COMP (i.e., complement) is an internal argument, i.e., a word, phrase or clause which is necessary to the head to complete its meaning (e.g., objects of transitive verbs);
- ADJT (i.e., adjunct) is a word, phrase or clause which modifies the head but which is not syntactically required by it (adjuncts are expected to be extranuclear, i.e., removing an adjunct would leave a grammatically well-formed sentence);
- SPEC (i.e., specifier) is an external argument, i.e., a word, phrase or clause which qualifies (determines) the head;
Examples
Consider, for instance, the examples below:
- 1. Verbal Phrase (VP)
Peter gave a new book to Mary yesterday.
- "gave" is the HEAD (nucleus) of the whole verbal phrase (because the whole structure is derived from "gave")
- "a new book" and "to Mary" are COMP (complements) of "gave" (because they are necessary to complete the meaning of "gave")[1]
- "yesterday" is an ADJT (adjunct) of "gave" (because, although relevant, they are not necessary to complete the meaning of "gave")[2]
- "Peter" is the SPEC (specifier) of "gave" (because it is the subject of "gave")
 
- 2. Nominal Phrase (NP)
Notes
- ↑ The sentences "*Peter gave to Mary yesterday" (i.e., without "a new book") and "*Peter gave a new book yesterday" (without "to Mary") will not be well-formed in the sense that something would be missing.
- ↑ The sentence "Peter gave a new book to Mary", although less informative, would be well-formed.